Hi metabolt community,

I am trying to use metabolt from work over my SOCKS ssh tunnel. I've run metabolt and checked the box to use proxy, tell it to use localhost : 1080, no user/pass and try to connect and it fails, saying the server closed the connection. The same config works in pidgin, so I was wondering if there were any other special tricks to getting proxy to work?

Any help is much appreciated.

Luke:
Thanks for your reply. Yes this proxy works in IE if I go to the connections tab, proxy settings advanced, and type in localhost:1080 in the Socks field.

--R

I changed my Proxy URI field to read http://127.0.0.1, with the same result. I know the proxy service works because I can test it in IE and my IM client. Does Metabolt support socks proxy services, or only http proxies?

Ah, that explains it then. In that case I can't use MB for now, but if its possible to add that as a feature that would indeed be awesome. Wiki has some decent technical info and links on the subject if you are unfamiliar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOCKS

Other than that thanks for your help!

Luke:
Sadly that doesn't quite work for me. Maybe its too much trouble and I'll have to give up the idea of using SL IM at work. But I'll explain my situation in case I am overlooking something:
I am trying to get metabolt working from my workplace. My company uses an HTTP Proxy for all web traffic, however I don't really want my IMs, and even the fact that I'm USING IMs to be seen by the company, so I have an SSH SOCKS proxy to my home server. I use this with my other external IM clients (Pidgin has SOCKS support built in, and I can use it for AIM/MSN/Facebook), but not with IE because it would slow me down too much and not let me get to internal resources.
Plus I would want to be *really sure* that the proxy was in effect.. call me paranoid but I would rather see a checkbox for "Use this proxy" instead of assuming that it is inhereting my IE settings.
I realize that this is probably not a mainstream desire so I understand if this is not even on the roadmap. Also, I have heard of some 3rd party tools being able to "socksify" programs by acting as a launcher and forwarding all traffic on behalf of the program, I may investigate this option.
Thanks for your time Luke!

Hi Luke,

I'm not quite sure I understand your standpoint; what do you mean when you say that it will allow anonymity? I don't understand what that means, or how it could be "a HUGE problem", since one still has to log in to the grid with thier regular username/pass. What is the potential for abuse here, if everyone had this ability?

Also, 1 message ago you stated the biggest roadblock was that "SOCKS in METAbolt will take a long time to deliver as it is quite involved", but now you say that "the biggest issue is not the amount of work", so I'm even more confused.

As a workaround, I could run metabolt directly on my SSH proxy server because I can also use it for VNC. So I really fail to see how the end result is any different, except for being massively more convienent for me. (Not having to have a VNC session open, not consuming server resources, sound enabled, etc)

As the developer, the decision whether or not to not include "Feature X" in the software is certainly yours, but I am a little disappointed, yes, and definetly unclear on the reasoning.

--Ron

Hi Luke,

Thanks for answering my post again. However, I still don't understand there being any potential negatives to this feature request, unless I have missed something you said, or if there is some intrinsic thing inherint in this solution that I am not aware of. If that is the case I apologize for being dense, but would again request more information as to what your concerns are? You yourself have said that there are many valid reasons to use SOCKS, and some "bad ones". I seek not to exploit anything malicious, and wish to use it for a valid reason (explained above). If you could detail the concerns openly, perhaps a solution or workaround could be reached. This is the spirit of open source. However, secrecy and obscurity are not only damaging to a software product but also to the user community, and on a personal note, frustrating.
If you are unable/unwilling to discuss this on the public board, may we go off the record in PM?
Thank you for your time.